Or rather, not in the room.
Where the hell did all the people go?
Where the hell did all the people go?
Freedomcall wrote: ↑Thu 5 Sep 2019 7:42 AMI see about 300 ppl on late NA/Asian time, but also see 1.4k ppl on Euro prime time(Even it was monday night).
Guess euro guys don't play wow cuz there weren't any population loss =P
relvinian wrote: ↑Thu 5 Sep 2019 11:47 AMgranted u europeans are eating cheese or whatever u do and many usa going to work.
Sleepwell wrote: ↑Thu 5 Sep 2019 3:15 PMPeaks and valley. I mentioned in guild and alliance this week that it feels like we lost another 20-40% of the remaining pop to WoW, School, vacation, boredom. Hopefully they come back.
Sepplord wrote: ↑Thu 5 Sep 2019 3:24 PMi got really confused for a sec, then i noticed you had posted two pictures. guess i accessed the post exactly between those two being posted
that said: the valley you picked out looks like a fluke. Either there was something wrong with the server there or with the output to the tracking site. It doesn't look like a representive valley
Sleepwell wrote: ↑Thu 5 Sep 2019 3:54 PMSepplord wrote: ↑Thu 5 Sep 2019 3:24 PMi got really confused for a sec, then i noticed you had posted two pictures. guess i accessed the post exactly between those two being posted
that said: the valley you picked out looks like a fluke. Either there was something wrong with the server there or with the output to the tracking site. It doesn't look like a representive valley
I'm not completely disagreeing with you. 8/2/19 being a fluke... that was labor day / US like i said. I think Canada had labor day on the same day?. So maybe that did play into it. I cut up the week to demonstrate the pattern though. I didnt manipulate the data, only showed the pattern. 5 days in succession that time frame. 3-350 players during that time period. Its possible that this has always been the case, but its way more apparent lately. As far as being a representative valley... i think it is.. its a pattern. In the end it doesnt matter. We play till we're done playing, then we move on. i just prefer pointing out to obvious to those who can make necessary adjustments. I prefer active over reactive. If they react when the base has left, its VERY hard to get them back....
pattern.JPG
ExcretusMaximus wrote: ↑Thu 5 Sep 2019 2:47 AMWoW and school.
If this wasn't expected, people were shortsighted.
relvinian wrote: ↑Thu 12 Sep 2019 4:18 AMYeah kept the 5 pounds off. Been going for long walks twice a day with my dog. Not gaming at all. Fishing. Reading.
I don't have any negative thoughts about the game I just can't seem to want to play.
I wonder if this is a natural process for all daoc servers/game servers.
But also i think it may be just an outlier. Maybe people will take a break and come back later. Who knows.
Frigzy wrote: ↑Mon 16 Sep 2019 9:00 AMNumbers dropped because Launch and its aftermath is an unnatural state of commitment most players are putting out. You'll see people skipping RL responsibilities for sometimes weeks on end just to get ahead of the curve or at least ride the top wave. Others simply play more often than they normally would because they're excited.
Now, several months later, things have been settling down for a while and the aftermath of launch is fading. People go back to their day to day routine and notice that their initial urge to play isn't as strong anymore, thus more frequently choose not to play and do something else. This effect accumulates as people lose in-game companions which creates its own effects.
Result, you have a much lower yet more stable population with people coming and going sporadically.
Sure other factors are also at play, but the trend at large is probably simply because of the fact that a new server launch is so overly intense.
Cadebrennus wrote: ↑Mon 16 Sep 2019 7:33 PMThe uncertainty of what sort of game I'm going to log into has made me log on less and less. Certain Devs who can't keep their hands off the code like a fat kid near a cookie jar has made me want to play less and less. I leveled to 50 at launch, wrote a guide, then left in disgust as wave after wave made it impossible to know what was coming next for my favourite class, favourite realm, or favourite game. I returned when I had more free time and at least a semblance of assurance that things had mellowed out patch-wise. Now, another major upheaval is in the works and players are jittery again. JUST STOP. Find a balance and then leave it alone, concentrating on bugs etc. The legendary RvR still brings in new players, as does a nontoxic community. Be supportive of new players, don't pull out the rug from under their feet (DEVS), and most of all, let them play in this sandbox with confidence.
relvinian wrote:Cadebrennus wrote: ↑Mon 16 Sep 2019 7:33 PMThe uncertainty of what sort of game I'm going to log into has made me log on less and less. Certain Devs who can't keep their hands off the code like a fat kid near a cookie jar has made me want to play less and less. I leveled to 50 at launch, wrote a guide, then left in disgust as wave after wave made it impossible to know what was coming next for my favourite class, favourite realm, or favourite game. I returned when I had more free time and at least a semblance of assurance that things had mellowed out patch-wise. Now, another major upheaval is in the works and players are jittery again. JUST STOP. Find a balance and then leave it alone, concentrating on bugs etc. The legendary RvR still brings in new players, as does a nontoxic community. Be supportive of new players, don't pull out the rug from under their feet (DEVS), and most of all, let them play in this sandbox with confidence.
This has some merit
Hector wrote: ↑Sun 22 Sep 2019 10:56 AMTime to bring back OF with flags and gvg list. LETS DO IT. Also please kill RP participation after rr5
iamsaitam wrote: ↑Sun 22 Sep 2019 10:15 PMServer wipe's don't result in higher numbers of people joining, quite the opposite.
Horus wrote: ↑Thu 5 Sep 2019 3:02 PMNostalgia is a draw. However that draw can quickly be satiated or lost.
IMO the nostalgia for classic WoW will wear off pretty quickly. The good old days aren't always as good as we remember. If you are a PvE fan which is pretty much all WoW is, you will quickly realize classic WoW does not age well with current expectations. Now you can say the same about Daoc and we see the evidence of this with every classic shard (pop peaks then drops). At least with Daoc you have a fairly unique PvP experience which can't help but introduce at least a little bit of variety each play session.
Halcyon702 wrote: ↑Sun 22 Sep 2019 10:29 AMrelvinian wrote:Cadebrennus wrote: ↑Mon 16 Sep 2019 7:33 PMThe uncertainty of what sort of game I'm going to log into has made me log on less and less. Certain Devs who can't keep their hands off the code like a fat kid near a cookie jar has made me want to play less and less. I leveled to 50 at launch, wrote a guide, then left in disgust as wave after wave made it impossible to know what was coming next for my favourite class, favourite realm, or favourite game. I returned when I had more free time and at least a semblance of assurance that things had mellowed out patch-wise. Now, another major upheaval is in the works and players are jittery again. JUST STOP. Find a balance and then leave it alone, concentrating on bugs etc. The legendary RvR still brings in new players, as does a nontoxic community. Be supportive of new players, don't pull out the rug from under their feet (DEVS), and most of all, let them play in this sandbox with confidence.
This has some merit
What a surprise. Server advertised as "classic" constantly making unpredictable changes people didn't ask for, don't want, and needlessly divide the community. Action was frequent and dynamic across multiple frontiers with that original flag system that allowed for change of pace and multiple styles of gameplay, fun while it lasted till devs do what devs do.
Patron wrote: ↑Fri 11 Oct 2019 10:53 AMClassic sucks...
I wanted a balanced server with a twist.
And i got what i want.
Thanks Phoenix.
For the players which loved pure classic experienced, i can say this.
There is a reason why Uthgard failed. And thats imho the classic and patchpointdogmatism.
Phoenix staff had the courage, Uthgard staff dont had and have.
Thanks!
I hope one day Uthgard staff can pull out the finger off, firing Abydos and create a server what is worth for the oldest daoc freeshard.
Got 2 good freeshards should be good for the daoc Szene
gromet12 wrote: ↑Fri 11 Oct 2019 10:03 PMBalance in who's eyes is the question....I see changes to "classic" and I'm fine with that but I also see it has created unintended consequences. Just look at the feather system as an example
A Mordred server would've been awesome as well
Horus wrote: ↑Tue 15 Oct 2019 1:30 PMI really don't think it has anything to do with Phoenix itself. They've landed on the optimal experience IMO. We have to admit, NF is more interesting than OF. The QoL tweaks are nice. Leveling is not a terrible grind. Classes seemed pretty balanced for the most part. There is plenty of PvE content if that is your thing. There is always at least some action somewhere, obviously depends on the time. Nothing is ever going to be perfect for everyone. Phoenix has done a pretty good job of catering to most.
DaoC is just an old game. We are the old guard hanging on. Every year there are fewer and fewer of us. Also, I don't think you can discount the WoW vs DaoC thing. I'm sure many who like DaoC also liked WoW and left to play on the classic server. I don't think you are going to be attract "new" players unless there is some cultural breakthrough that puts DaoC back on the map and inspires a younger generation to want to try it.
Horus wrote: ↑Tue 15 Oct 2019 1:30 PMI really don't think it has anything to do with Phoenix itself. They've landed on the optimal experience IMO. We have to admit, NF is more interesting than OF. The QoL tweaks are nice. Leveling is not a terrible grind. Classes seemed pretty balanced for the most part. There is plenty of PvE content if that is your thing. There is always at least some action somewhere, obviously depends on the time. Nothing is ever going to be perfect for everyone. Phoenix has done a pretty good job of catering to most.
DaoC is just an old game. We are the old guard hanging on. Every year there are fewer and fewer of us. Also, I don't think you can discount the WoW vs DaoC thing. I'm sure many who like DaoC also liked WoW and left to play on the classic server. I don't think you are going to be attract "new" players unless there is some cultural breakthrough that puts DaoC back on the map and inspires a younger generation to want to try it.
relvinian wrote: ↑Thu 5 Sep 2019 11:47 AMI never played wow and i don't plan on starting. I actually stopped playing and started working out more, walking, and went fishing a couple times.
lost 5 pounds so far.
I might log in a little bit but if i see sub 300 i won't bother.
Albion: 169 Midgard: 139 Hibernia: 105, granted u europeans are eating cheese or whatever u do and many usa going to work.
So. single classes should get a buff / be OP just because one realm is underpopped?Aminita wrote: ↑Mon 25 Nov 2019 1:03 AM… various other nerfs ( animist especially.. in an underdog realm) ...
Just to widen your perspective. At EU-Primetime, Albion usually has 20+% more lvl50/RvR-population than Midgard.Aminita wrote: ↑Mon 25 Nov 2019 1:03 AM… Which realm has the biggest and baddest tanks already ?? Oh Midgard?? The Realm that is consistently walking over ALL the other realms gets a Boost.. SAD....
Please state more than one Hibernia nerf that occured in the last months. All I could remember was the shroom nerf, which was neccesary but quite drastic.Aminita wrote: ↑Mon 25 Nov 2019 1:03 AMI know a lot of HIbs .. just totally fed up with getting nerfed again and again when being the underdog. They have just left.. For WOW, Live .. ANY other game..
People that have played DAOC for 10-15 years..
Cant say that I blame them ..
Lillebror wrote: ↑Tue 26 Nov 2019 10:59 AMBack under 30g each...
I didnt buy stacks of 10 above 200g that gave 7ish bobles pre nerf.
Feel free to send me a guide on pm (hib) when your done.
falcon wrote: ↑Tue 26 Nov 2019 2:30 PMLillebror wrote: ↑Tue 26 Nov 2019 10:59 AMBack under 30g each...
I didnt buy stacks of 10 above 200g that gave 7ish bobles pre nerf.
Feel free to send me a guide on pm (hib) when your done.
Post nerf its not rare to up with 10 items only (around level 20) so people crying because they need to pay 250 for 10 bubbles instead of 200 for 7 ? :p
My guide will be 100% alb (I hate other realms :p ), and if u want to up 50 a week on hib just farm alb and send platine to hib (but I'm sure anim is fastest than cabal ^^)
Luluko wrote: ↑Fri 6 Dec 2019 10:56 AMI left 1-2 months before the nf change only playing skald was boring and skald was pretty weak vs most things with 9sec slam. Maybe I will check back in if they add speed of the hunt in some way or do something about that slam duration. But I havent really kept much track of the changes.
Razur Ur wrote: ↑Fri 6 Dec 2019 12:20 PMLuluko wrote: ↑Fri 6 Dec 2019 10:56 AMI left 1-2 months before the nf change only playing skald was boring and skald was pretty weak vs most things with 9sec slam. Maybe I will check back in if they add speed of the hunt in some way or do something about that slam duration. But I havent really kept much track of the changes.
Really Skald to weak? wtf :-D you knowing RA Purge?
Luluko wrote: ↑Fri 6 Dec 2019 2:17 PMRazur Ur wrote: ↑Fri 6 Dec 2019 12:20 PMLuluko wrote: ↑Fri 6 Dec 2019 10:56 AMI left 1-2 months before the nf change only playing skald was boring and skald was pretty weak vs most things with 9sec slam. Maybe I will check back in if they add speed of the hunt in some way or do something about that slam duration. But I havent really kept much track of the changes.
Really Skald to weak? wtf :-D you knowing RA Purge?
when you hit with hammer on something like a hero you will prolly get slammed 2-3 before he is dead and bms/reavers/mercs/champs murder you way too fast aswell and then they also have slam yeah I dont think always having to rely on purge to win a fight or even been able to escape isnt a good idea. Thats why I would rather like to play something else solo but without speed of the hunt or something similar thats just no fun. And if I have no fun I stop playing its as easy as that.
Razur Ur wrote: ↑Fri 6 Dec 2019 2:32 PMLuluko wrote: ↑Fri 6 Dec 2019 2:17 PM
when you hit with hammer on something like a hero you will prolly get slammed 2-3 before he is dead and bms/reavers/mercs/champs murder you way too fast aswell and then they also have slam yeah I dont think always having to rely on purge to win a fight or even been able to escape isnt a good idea. Thats why I would rather like to play something else solo but without speed of the hunt or something similar thats just no fun. And if I have no fun I stop playing its as easy as that.
ey guy, i need all time my RA´s for win a fucking 1vs1 with my champion! often my slam is a shit without static because all enemy´s have rdy purge! and you with skald have the choose to fight or not fight with your nice speed and if you are especially funny with skald, can you kite and kill a fian with your two DD´s btw ;-). Use brain if you want win a 1vs1 but not QQ and say Skald is to weak.
Riac wrote: ↑Fri 6 Dec 2019 8:13 PMim confused. why is hammer your only choice as a skald? just because the taunt requires little endo to use seems like a pretty weak answer. you dont need the backsnare that much. axe and sword are both pretty acceptable options, axe being the best imo. however, hammer allows you to blow up stealthers.
gotwqqd wrote: ↑Fri 6 Dec 2019 7:41 PMCrying about one of the strongest 1v1 classes out there because it has trouble with a handful of classes...kite more and that list will diminish.
The game is designed so there are some classes are very hard for a class to handle
gotwqqd wrote: ↑Fri 6 Dec 2019 9:27 PMRiac wrote: ↑Fri 6 Dec 2019 8:13 PMim confused. why is hammer your only choice as a skald? just because the taunt requires little endo to use seems like a pretty weak answer. you dont need the backsnare that much. axe and sword are both pretty acceptable options, axe being the best imo. however, hammer allows you to blow up stealthers.
I completely agree
Hammer is overrated, I think axe is superior line Midgard
Patron wrote: ↑Tue 26 Nov 2019 10:59 PMWhen you´re the only one who see a elephant in a room, probably something´s wrong with you...
Andryah wrote: ↑Wed 11 Dec 2019 12:27 AMgotwqqd wrote: ↑Fri 6 Dec 2019 9:27 PMRiac wrote: ↑Fri 6 Dec 2019 8:13 PMim confused. why is hammer your only choice as a skald? just because the taunt requires little endo to use seems like a pretty weak answer. you dont need the backsnare that much. axe and sword are both pretty acceptable options, axe being the best imo. however, hammer allows you to blow up stealthers.
I completely agree
Hammer is overrated, I think axe is superior line Midgard
I generally always went 2H axe with my Skalds. Got to have an endurance buff though... but axe styles are great for a support class like a Skald if they are in a group. Solo though.... best to go with hammer in my experience.. particularly for leveling in PvE.
Riac wrote: ↑Fri 6 Dec 2019 8:13 PMim confused. why is hammer your only choice as a skald? just because the taunt requires little endo to use seems like a pretty weak answer. you dont need the backsnare that much. axe and sword are both pretty acceptable options, axe being the best imo. however, hammer allows you to blow up stealthers.
Luluko wrote: ↑Thu 12 Dec 2019 10:32 AMRiac wrote: ↑Fri 6 Dec 2019 8:13 PMim confused. why is hammer your only choice as a skald? just because the taunt requires little endo to use seems like a pretty weak answer. you dont need the backsnare that much. axe and sword are both pretty acceptable options, axe being the best imo. however, hammer allows you to blow up stealthers.
It has been a while since I compared the weaponlines axe or sword would be the best choice for weapon proccs aswell (I think there was a str/con debuff once but not sure if thats still the case), but all the stuns are after block and not useable for a skald, positionals were crap and the endu usage was also crap, damage was also not better if you dont hit something with vulnerable armor and since we dont have endu4 pots and cant specc into lw2+ you use up a lot of endurance especially if you have to kite. The negatives outweight the damage typ and proccs by far if you solo. Its way easier to just avoid tanks. But like I said before my issues isnt especially skald since I still went to 7l6 with mine but I generally dont like to play the same class for too long or it gets boring, but soloing without speed of the hunt on a visible is just no fun.
Forlornhope wrote: ↑Thu 12 Dec 2019 11:59 AMLuluko wrote: ↑Thu 12 Dec 2019 10:32 AMRiac wrote: ↑Fri 6 Dec 2019 8:13 PMim confused. why is hammer your only choice as a skald? just because the taunt requires little endo to use seems like a pretty weak answer. you dont need the backsnare that much. axe and sword are both pretty acceptable options, axe being the best imo. however, hammer allows you to blow up stealthers.
It has been a while since I compared the weaponlines axe or sword would be the best choice for weapon proccs aswell (I think there was a str/con debuff once but not sure if thats still the case), but all the stuns are after block and not useable for a skald, positionals were crap and the endu usage was also crap, damage was also not better if you dont hit something with vulnerable armor and since we dont have endu4 pots and cant specc into lw2+ you use up a lot of endurance especially if you have to kite. The negatives outweight the damage typ and proccs by far if you solo. Its way easier to just avoid tanks. But like I said before my issues isnt especially skald since I still went to 7l6 with mine but I generally dont like to play the same class for too long or it gets boring, but soloing without speed of the hunt on a visible is just no fun.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but are there not dex/qui and str/con debuff player crafted charges? I seem to remember having one thrown onto a crafted shield, then realized that the range on it sucked so I ended up remaking it. If that's the case, might want to look into it and it may make the debate even more pointless. Making hammer just undoubtedly superior, throw 'em onto a piece like gloves or boots. Could be pretty nice on a skald.
relvinian wrote: ↑Wed 4 Sep 2019 11:20 PMOr rather, not in the room.
Where the hell did all the people go?
Riac wrote: ↑Fri 13 Dec 2019 5:55 PMbuff charge? they pretty much got rid of those months ago. what buff charges are worth using in the game anymore?
still not seeing the problem with axe or sword. it takes a lot of endo while kiting??? you probably need to start toggling your sprint, id bet anything youre leaving it on while standing next to someone. if theyre sprinting away and youre forced to spam styles, thats also fine since you arent taking dmg and youre a skald, you wont be outrun.
this just seems like a whine fest while not knowing whats even going on. your first post states that you must go hammer and have no other choice, and now you havent compared the lines in quite some time? there is absolutely no problem with skald in terms of power lvl, tbh i cant believe you even made this post.
Luluko wrote: ↑Sun 15 Dec 2019 4:22 PMRiac wrote: ↑Fri 13 Dec 2019 5:55 PMbuff charge? they pretty much got rid of those months ago. what buff charges are worth using in the game anymore?
still not seeing the problem with axe or sword. it takes a lot of endo while kiting??? you probably need to start toggling your sprint, id bet anything youre leaving it on while standing next to someone. if theyre sprinting away and youre forced to spam styles, thats also fine since you arent taking dmg and youre a skald, you wont be outrun.
this just seems like a whine fest while not knowing whats even going on. your first post states that you must go hammer and have no other choice, and now you havent compared the lines in quite some time? there is absolutely no problem with skald in terms of power lvl, tbh i cant believe you even made this post.
yeah maybe I am just too dumb to play solo skald vs tanks, doesnt change the fact tho that I rather dont spend my time on a class which needs to do a lot of extra effort just to be able to kill tanks. So I will wait for something like bp speed so that I can play reaver/champ or I just play another game I dont mind. I have played enough daoc in my time I dont have to play it forever.
If I can’t have advantage over everyone else I’m taking my ball and going home.Luluko wrote: ↑Sun 15 Dec 2019 4:22 PMRiac wrote: ↑Fri 13 Dec 2019 5:55 PMbuff charge? they pretty much got rid of those months ago. what buff charges are worth using in the game anymore?
still not seeing the problem with axe or sword. it takes a lot of endo while kiting??? you probably need to start toggling your sprint, id bet anything youre leaving it on while standing next to someone. if theyre sprinting away and youre forced to spam styles, thats also fine since you arent taking dmg and youre a skald, you wont be outrun.
this just seems like a whine fest while not knowing whats even going on. your first post states that you must go hammer and have no other choice, and now you havent compared the lines in quite some time? there is absolutely no problem with skald in terms of power lvl, tbh i cant believe you even made this post.
yeah maybe I am just too dumb to play solo skald vs tanks, doesnt change the fact tho that I rather dont spend my time on a class which needs to do a lot of extra effort just to be able to kill tanks. So I will wait for something like bp speed so that I can play reaver/champ or I just play another game I dont mind. I have played enough daoc in my time I dont have to play it forever.
well if you solo on a visible you need any advantage there isgotwqqd wrote: ↑Sun 15 Dec 2019 5:30 PMIf I can’t have advantage over everyone else I’m taking my ball and going home.Luluko wrote: ↑Sun 15 Dec 2019 4:22 PMRiac wrote: ↑Fri 13 Dec 2019 5:55 PMbuff charge? they pretty much got rid of those months ago. what buff charges are worth using in the game anymore?
still not seeing the problem with axe or sword. it takes a lot of endo while kiting??? you probably need to start toggling your sprint, id bet anything youre leaving it on while standing next to someone. if theyre sprinting away and youre forced to spam styles, thats also fine since you arent taking dmg and youre a skald, you wont be outrun.
this just seems like a whine fest while not knowing whats even going on. your first post states that you must go hammer and have no other choice, and now you havent compared the lines in quite some time? there is absolutely no problem with skald in terms of power lvl, tbh i cant believe you even made this post.
yeah maybe I am just too dumb to play solo skald vs tanks, doesnt change the fact tho that I rather dont spend my time on a class which needs to do a lot of extra effort just to be able to kill tanks. So I will wait for something like bp speed so that I can play reaver/champ or I just play another game I dont mind. I have played enough daoc in my time I dont have to play it forever.
Luluko wrote: ↑Sun 15 Dec 2019 10:45 PMwell if you solo on a visible you need any advantage there isgotwqqd wrote: ↑Sun 15 Dec 2019 5:30 PMIf I can’t have advantage over everyone else I’m taking my ball and going home.Luluko wrote: ↑Sun 15 Dec 2019 4:22 PMyeah maybe I am just too dumb to play solo skald vs tanks, doesnt change the fact tho that I rather dont spend my time on a class which needs to do a lot of extra effort just to be able to kill tanks. So I will wait for something like bp speed so that I can play reaver/champ or I just play another game I dont mind. I have played enough daoc in my time I dont have to play it forever.
I am "crying" because I dont have the option to run on another visible class because there is no speed of the hunt or horses. I doesnt matter if I can beat a class or not its just that I dont want to be forced to be stationary as a none speed class when I want to solo. Is it so hard to comprehend that or is my english really that bad...Riac wrote: ↑Sun 15 Dec 2019 10:55 PM
are you really just crying because you cant kill tanks without trying hard?? wtf is even going on lol.
im a 9l6 shadowblade and a lot of the time ill think twice before i pop on a tank, they are strong (as they should be). blade mercs and bms with shields, dont even bother. champs with shields, dont even bother. fuck reavers, they are gimp lol.
Luluko wrote: ↑Mon 16 Dec 2019 2:42 PMI am "crying" because I dont have the option to run on another visible class because there is no speed of the hunt or horses. I doesnt matter if I can beat a class or not its just that I dont want to be forced to be stationary as a none speed class when I want to solo. Is it so hard to comprehend that or is my english really that bad...Riac wrote: ↑Sun 15 Dec 2019 10:55 PMLuluko wrote: ↑Sun 15 Dec 2019 10:45 PMwell if you solo on a visible you need any advantage there is
are you really just crying because you cant kill tanks without trying hard?? wtf is even going on lol.
im a 9l6 shadowblade and a lot of the time ill think twice before i pop on a tank, they are strong (as they should be). blade mercs and bms with shields, dont even bother. champs with shields, dont even bother. fuck reavers, they are gimp lol.
Good ideaRiac wrote: ↑Mon 16 Dec 2019 9:01 PMLuluko wrote: ↑Mon 16 Dec 2019 2:42 PMI am "crying" because I dont have the option to run on another visible class because there is no speed of the hunt or horses. I doesnt matter if I can beat a class or not its just that I dont want to be forced to be stationary as a none speed class when I want to solo. Is it so hard to comprehend that or is my english really that bad...Riac wrote: ↑Sun 15 Dec 2019 10:55 PMare you really just crying because you cant kill tanks without trying hard?? wtf is even going on lol.
im a 9l6 shadowblade and a lot of the time ill think twice before i pop on a tank, they are strong (as they should be). blade mercs and bms with shields, dont even bother. champs with shields, dont even bother. fuck reavers, they are gimp lol.
Please watch your language. Greetings, Uthred. until they provide some sort of incentive for ppl to move out from the keeps, i dont anything will improve much.
You seem not to be happy here, maybe its time to follow your 30 peeps which plays on Uthgard now.teiloh wrote: Most people I know who quit quit because of NF.
Luluko wrote: ↑Mon 16 Dec 2019 2:42 PMI am "crying" because I dont have the option to run on another visible class because there is no speed of the hunt or horses. I doesnt matter if I can beat a class or not its just that I dont want to be forced to be stationary as a none speed class when I want to solo. Is it so hard to comprehend that or is my english really that bad...Riac wrote: ↑Sun 15 Dec 2019 10:55 PMLuluko wrote: ↑Sun 15 Dec 2019 10:45 PMwell if you solo on a visible you need any advantage there is
are you really just crying because you cant kill tanks without trying hard?? wtf is even going on lol.
im a 9l6 shadowblade and a lot of the time ill think twice before i pop on a tank, they are strong (as they should be). blade mercs and bms with shields, dont even bother. champs with shields, dont even bother. fuck reavers, they are gimp lol.
Patron wrote: ↑Sat 28 Dec 2019 1:13 PMThere is no fucking elephant in the room.
This server is the best freeshard ever.
We are still around 1.4k at prime and never dropping below 300 players.
And all that, just because we have this awesome staff which want to go new ways and give us, the players, the best daoc experience since ever.
We all know what happen when just copy a stupid patchpoint and not try some new shit.
Dear staff, plz close this stupid thread. There ia no good income from QQ-Threads like this.
THANKS for PHOENIX!!!
Frug wrote: ↑Thu 9 Jan 2020 7:51 PMPatron wrote: ↑Sat 28 Dec 2019 1:13 PMThere is no fucking elephant in the room.
This server is the best freeshard ever.
We are still around 1.4k at prime and never dropping below 300 players.
And all that, just because we have this awesome staff which want to go new ways and give us, the players, the best daoc experience since ever.
We all know what happen when just copy a stupid patchpoint and not try some new shit.
Dear staff, plz close this stupid thread. There ia no good income from QQ-Threads like this.
THANKS for PHOENIX!!!
The server hasn't seen 1400 since September, and then only 1 day in that entire month. You do drop below 300 (although barely).
It is the most populated DAOC Freeshard as far as I know, however, and I do think the staff are doing a great job. But don' t overplay the numbers.
tyrantanic wrote: ↑Thu 9 Jan 2020 8:24 PMFrug wrote: ↑Thu 9 Jan 2020 7:51 PMPatron wrote: ↑Sat 28 Dec 2019 1:13 PMThere is no fucking elephant in the room.
This server is the best freeshard ever.
We are still around 1.4k at prime and never dropping below 300 players.
And all that, just because we have this awesome staff which want to go new ways and give us, the players, the best daoc experience since ever.
We all know what happen when just copy a stupid patchpoint and not try some new shit.
Dear staff, plz close this stupid thread. There ia no good income from QQ-Threads like this.
THANKS for PHOENIX!!!
The server hasn't seen 1400 since September, and then only 1 day in that entire month. You do drop below 300 (although barely).
It is the most populated DAOC Freeshard as far as I know, however, and I do think the staff are doing a great job. But don' t overplay the numbers.
Phoenix is doing as well, maybe slightly better, than Uthgard 2.0 with respect to their release dates in terms of population. I suspect Phoenix will retain a consistent ~1k population max through the summer considering there is no better alternative available for DAoC. Uth is dead and Live F2P flopped hard as it hasn't even recovered its pre-Phoenix population. I'm fairly new to this server and honestly regret not jumping on the bandwagon back in January / February 2019. I think Phoenix is the best DAoC server around at the moment. Time will tell but I will be spending mine on Phoenix.
Return to Tavern or the latest topics