Re: SB damage vs infil

#21
Really surprised to hear that low dps, even when debuffed to hell with enerv and strcon debuff (Sb's have this as a weapon proc) and str debuff I hit harder than that as a blade luri. 90-100ish a swing. Them hitting you for 150 pretty much tells me they resisted or purged your debuff. No SB hits for 150mh no crit no dmg add when debuffed.

Are you pierce spec?

Maybe screenshot and post a log next time you see it happen, and a screenshot of your debuffs or a clip would be good.

Cant think of a good reason you'd hit for 50 only excluding abla or lack of buffs or a major flaw, theres no secret sauce, and all those named SB's are very beatable.

Will send you a pm too
Tani - Nightshade - RR10
Mezzmerelda - Bard - RR6

Na Fianna Dragun


Tani - REAPER NEWEST VIDEO 3 OCT

Two Days with Undacover<3 NEWEST VIDEO 9 OCT

2 Versus Tani

Nightshade Solo Videos 1-4

Loki/Undacover - Special Edition Video

Re: SB damage vs infil

#23
Np, yeah share a vid or a log when you notice it. Also if it was the other day, the enerv debuff got buffed temporarily so the debuff effect was really aggresive, dropped my MH dmg on garotte to about 80 when fully debuffed, not 50.

Thats not the case any more it got paired back to a more reasonable level so you should do more dmg again now.

But equally SB dmg was also affected if they didnt resist the enerv so that should have still been level playing field.

The str/con proc or charge arent really worth worrying about. you have your own versions of them.
Tani - Nightshade - RR10
Mezzmerelda - Bard - RR6

Na Fianna Dragun


Tani - REAPER NEWEST VIDEO 3 OCT

Two Days with Undacover<3 NEWEST VIDEO 9 OCT

2 Versus Tani

Nightshade Solo Videos 1-4

Loki/Undacover - Special Edition Video

Re: SB damage vs infil

#24
writing reduced dmg too will help ppl understand more correctly.
It is hard to believe that 50 was your solely 'mainhand' 'duel shadow' dmg, but if the combat log showed like 50(-29), you can assure that there was no ablative working. And if it was 50(-57), it is definately abla.

And i assume 130-150 he did was not the anytimer. I can't be perfectly sure cuz i didnt see the fight myself, but i think it mustve been reactives or positionals if required poisons were all applied.

Re: SB damage vs infil

#25
Freedomcall wrote:
Wed Aug 14, 2019 3:01 pm
writing reduced dmg too will help ppl understand more correctly.
It is hard to believe that 50 was your solely 'mainhand' 'duel shadow' dmg, but if the combat log showed like 50(-29), you can assure that there was no ablative working. And if it was 50(-57), it is definately abla.

And i assume 130-150 he did was not the anytimer. I can't be perfectly sure cuz i didnt see the fight myself, but i think it mustve been reactives or positionals if required poisons were all applied.
Imo that would make it less transparent...the numbers in bracket are modifications to the actual dmg of the hit to the player.
Ablative shows as speellabsorb in a different color.

Mixing both together wouldn't make it more clear?

Re: SB damage vs infil

#27
Sepplord wrote:
Wed Aug 14, 2019 3:16 pm
Freedomcall wrote:
Wed Aug 14, 2019 3:01 pm
writing reduced dmg too will help ppl understand more correctly.
It is hard to believe that 50 was your solely 'mainhand' 'duel shadow' dmg, but if the combat log showed like 50(-29), you can assure that there was no ablative working. And if it was 50(-57), it is definately abla.

And i assume 130-150 he did was not the anytimer. I can't be perfectly sure cuz i didnt see the fight myself, but i think it mustve been reactives or positionals if required poisons were all applied.
Imo that would make it less transparent...the numbers in bracket are modifications to the actual dmg of the hit to the player.
Ablative shows as speellabsorb in a different color.

Mixing both together wouldn't make it more clear?
Of course, writing both will make it more clear.
But i sometimes see some ppl fail to find absorbs from combat log for some reason.
Then, this becomes the most possible to way to 'interpret' what happened.
Most of the absorbs ppl use is 50% one, and considering that 50 is an uncommon dmg as a Styled-dmg, I can 'assume' that 50% dmg reduction would've worked fully on that situation.
So you can calculate using the numbers in bracket to get a more closer look when you only have limited information.

Re: SB damage vs infil

#28
FiltyTrator wrote:
Wed Aug 14, 2019 3:55 pm
The way you worded your spec sounds like you are using thrust/DW styles? If you aren't using hamstring chain, that why your damage sucks.
Even if that was the case, that's not going to excuse 50dmg MH swing. An unstyled swing should hit for more than that.